Ashley Morrison's Blog

July 29, 2010

Base Usage Rate.

In their book, Beyond the Lens, the Association of Photographers give Photographers (in the UK), guidelines as to what they should be taking into account, when negotiating the fee for the use of their images. They talk briefly about the Base Usage Rate (BUR) and then go to great lengths to give us percentage figures, so as we can calculate what the Licence fee should be, for the use of the images that we produce and / or create, for others to use.
Most Photographers know that they own the Copyright of the images that they create; however, calculating their value and/or determining what they should charge, often causes them lots of problems.

So, here is my take on the Association of Photographer’s BUR pricing system and how it works – which I hope others will find of value:

As a commercial photographer, we simply produce & provide images for others to use.

So our goal is to produce & provide the best images possible so that others will want to use them… and use them a lot.
Simple.

However, putting a price on what we do is not quite so simple.
Why ?

Because there are more than 100 different ways to shoot any subject – from quick snap-shots using just a basic camera, through to full production staged shots using larger camera systems, lights, models, stylists, etc, etc – which means all images are not equal or the same. So depending on which way we choose to shoot it, that will, in some way or other affect the value to both you & others … which will ultimately affect the fee.

And because the images are usually being produced for others to use, then the value of what the images are worth to them, really needs to be taken into account too. Media use, Period of use & Territory of use, are usually the 3 main things that will determine that value to them.

So all of this needs to be taken into account – and this is were the Association of Photographer’s BUR pricing system comes into play – to help us determine the value of our images and what the fee ‘should be’ to ensure we get it right.

The BUR figure is therefore our starting point.

It’s our estimated basic production costs, to produce images for ‘Standard use’.
(Standard use is considered to be either: 2 media for 1 year or 1 media for 2 years, in 1 country).

So we start by working-out what our basic production costs would be first, by taking the following things into account:

Pre production time:
Photography time:
Post production time:
Travel time:
Retouching time:
Crew / Assistant:
Stylist / Hair / Make-up:
DVD & back-up:
Prints / Contact sheets:
Insurance:
Location / Studio fee:
Props, Wardrobe:
Rentals:
Sets / Expendable:
Courier / P&P:
Actors / Models:
Travel / Fuel:
Miscellaneous:

(Please note: some of these things may not apply – it’s simply a check-list to help us work-out what our basic costs will be, to finance the project to a standard level – which may be very different to the actual usage required by the client).

Next, we divide is figure by the number of images or ‘sets of images’ we plan to produce and that becomes our BUR per image price.

(Added note: The AOP suggest this figure should not be less than one’s normal day rate – which is fine – but I prefer to calculate it on a per image bases, so each image or ‘set of images’ has its own value – and include our production costs, so as we know where we stand.)

(Also note: our ‘day rate’ doesn’t change here – so this figure is calculated out using our normal day rate figure – not a ‘day rate’ figure which has already taken the client’s usage into account – because their actually usage requirements may change, once they see the final results. So this is our base rate figure for standard use, which is our starting point, when negotiating the fee, for the use of our images.)

Then using the Association of Photographer’s guidelines – which can be found in their book Beyond the Lens – we can workout what the Licence fee should be, for the use of our images that the client requires.

So the Licence fee will be based on the client’s actual usage requirements – as opposed to our actual costs – which may be very different.

Example:
If the client says they only want to use the images for Web use only (1 media) or for Magazine ads & Brochures (2 media), then the Licence fee would be similar to our BUR figure – as it would be based on either 1 media for 2 years Use on the Worldwide web or 2 Media for 1 years Use in 1 country i.e. Standard use.

If however, the client said they required more use of our images than this, then we would negotiate the fee starting with the BUR figure and add (+%) to that figure – or if they said they required less use of the images than this, then we would negotiate the fee by giving them a discount (-%).

So the Media use, Period of use & Territory of use, are the 3 key things that we would take into account when quoting a fee.

(As it’s the client’s usage requirements that will determine the value of the images to them – and it’s that value to them that will determine their budget – which this system helps us put a figure on.)

Which means, because there are more than 100 different ways to shoot any subject, it’s this figure we then use to determine what we can ultimately do, to meet their needs.

Which is based on:

Little Use = Little Value.
Greater Use = Greater Value.

When Quoting a fee, we try to keep it simple for our clients to understand; as well as, make the deal as clear as possible, so as to avoid any misunderstandings down the road.

Example:
The Quote below is based on a client (Ace Company Ltd) asking us to produce & then provide them with 6 images, for them to use in 3 media, for 3 years. (As you can see, we have estimated our Base Rate for Standard use to be £210.00 per image).
So to help us meet this client’s planed usage requirements, the fee – based on that information and using the AOP’s guidelines – would be calulated out like so:
BUR +100% for the additional media, plus for 3 years use (in those 3 media) we would add 100%, which would then equal the total amount, which we would be estimating would be required here.
This is known as the Licence fee… which if approved, would then become our budget to meet this client’s needs:
Quote
Please note: Licence fee based on the above … meaning the information above, which is based on my understanding of the facts, which I have simply listed. Should that information change, then naturally the Licence fee would change too – so a new Quote, based on that new information, would therefore need to be submitted.

(Added note: it’s the +% amount that you use, to help you to raise the bar, to meet their additional Usage requirements.)

So we use the BUR figure to workout the Licence fee – and it’s that fee that we then use to determine what we can ultimately do – to achieve our goal.

Which is to produce & provide the best images possible so that others will want to use them… and use them a lot..

A win, win situation for everyone, if we succeed.

34 Comments »

  1. Hi Ashley. You should really consider installing an anti-spam plugin like akismet for the comments on your blog. Many of the recent comments here are obviously spam and based on the grammar they are likely generated by bots. I love your blog, but these spam comments make it look bad and overshadow the real comments from real people.

    Comment by andrew — May 30, 2012 @ 3:25 pm | Reply

  2. Just a smiling visitant here to share the enjoy (:, btw outstanding style.

    Comment by http://www.livelyseo.com#seo marketing — May 30, 2012 @ 1:21 am | Reply

  3. Hello! I would wish to supply a large thumbs up for your outstanding info you could have here about this post. I’ll be coming back to your blog website for further soon.

    Comment by Homepage — May 26, 2012 @ 11:46 pm | Reply

  4. Great work! That is the type of info that are meant to be shared around the net. Disgrace on the seek engines for no longer positioning this submit upper! Come on over and consult with my site . Thanks =)

    Comment by sol yours truly — May 14, 2012 @ 1:08 pm | Reply

  5. Hi Ashley, Many thanks for the informative posting. You mention in your example when calculating licence fees for additional media that you’d charge an extra 100% for 1 extra media.

    The AoP calculator seems to have different % for different media so if a client wanted 3 differing types of media, which additional % rate would you normally use? Its probably very simple but its a new system to me and I’d like to understand it better.

    Comment by Lee Christiansen — May 6, 2012 @ 10:20 am | Reply

    • That’s correct, so depending on which additional media it was or how many different media they need to use the images in, the % amount here may change here.

      Because you would now need to take that additional information into account, when you are going to produce these images e.g. you may now need to use a medium format camera or shoot it as an upright as well as in landscape, etc, etc – if they wanted to use the images on Billboards & Posters, as well as on their website and magazine ads.
      Which basically means, you may need a bigger budget here, to meet their needs… hence the +% to help you achieve that and cover any additional costs, that you may now occur over and above what you could take some pictures for, if it was only for normal or standard use.

      (Added Note: Remember, when talking to the client, it’s all to do with the ‘value to them’, rather than to do with ‘you’. So therefore, you are saying the fee goes up +% due to the things that are important to them, when negotiating the fee for the use of your images – rather than saying to them: “because it will cost me more or because it will take me longer to do, etc, etc, then that’s why you will need to pay me more” – because it’s not about ‘you’, it’s about what is of ‘value to them’ ).

      So for example:-
      For the additional use in magazine ads, I would usually add 100%, same for Brochures, Ambient, Billboards & Television.
      For the other media, I would usually add either 50% or 25% in some cases.
      For 'All Media' use, the AOP say you should add 750%, because if you add them all up that would the total % … which should therefore give you a big enough budget to help you meet your client's requirements here.

      Please note: these are just guidelines to help you negotiate the fee – they are not saying this is what you must charge or even what you should charge – because that is totally up to you.

      Comment by Ashley Morrison — May 6, 2012 @ 10:49 am | Reply

      • Thanks Ashley. I’ve got a feeling I’ve been undercharging for far too long. I need to revisit my daily rates and how I charge % for use.

        Comment by Lee Christiansen — May 6, 2012 @ 11:13 am

      • Basically what this system does or tells my client, is that I could take some pictures for £210 per image here, if they didn’t really need to use them that much.
        However, to meet their requirements – which I have listed here for them to clearly see – then this is the sort of figure (or budget or fee) that I would now be talking about, to help me produce those sort of images instead… which would obviously be different to the ones I would be taking for £210 per image.

        Because it’s the budget, that will ultimately determine what I can afford to do or even think of doing here – which in turn will affect the true value to them.

        As providing them with some images that they don’t actually want to use that much, isn’t going to be worth much to them – even though they could use them as much as they like.

        Because there is a difference between providing them with some images to meet their needs and just providing them with some pictures that they can use if they want to – which this pricing system will help you with, because it takes their actual usage requirements into account.

        So you may not be undercharging for what you are actually providing them with at present; however, you could be undervaluing what they are asking you to provide them with, if your images are currently not meet their usage requirements or what all they have said they need to use your images for – because you haven’t really taking that information into account, when you were quoting a fee.

        To illustrate what I’m talking about here: lets say this recent client just asked me for a price, to come along and take some pictures of his hotel – and I didn’t bother asking him what all he needed to use the images for, so I just gave him a price based on me turning up to take some pictures.

        Then I could have just turned up and taken some pictures like this… First image taken at the Library at the Club house in Dromoland Castle
        .. rather than producing an image like this…
        Final image of the Library at the Club house in Dromoland Castle

        Now if I had quoted £210 per image, then I wouldn’t really have overcharged for the first image, as it would be of little value or use to him – in fact he may even feel I had overcharged for this and would therefore probably be very reluctant to pay me anything at all. However, if I had quoted £210 per image and provided him with second image, then I would have been a fool – as that is the sort of image he will get a huge amount of use out of, for years to come.

        So, the amount I would be charging and/or the amount this client would be willing to pay for the use of these 2 images – all be it the same picture of the same room taken by the same photographer using the same camera – would be very different.

        Image 2 would therefore be +% more or in this case +++% more, due to what all the client in the end said he wanted to use the image for – rather than want it cost me to produce, as both images would have roughly cost me the same.

        Comment by Ashley Morrison — May 6, 2012 @ 12:04 pm

      • Good point Ashley. I guess I need to rethink how I package my prices and you’ve given me a few things to think about.

        Comment by Lee Christiansen — May 6, 2012 @ 6:16 pm

  6. Dear Ashley, thank you very much for this article. I found it very useful. 

    What would happen in the following case (this is what I am trying to figure out): I was contacted to shoot 40 lifestyle images. Lets say my total production costs were 160 eur – that gives me a BUR of 4 euro/image. But as you do with lifestyle shootig you always grab extra shots – did not influence the production cost maybe a couple more minutes post processing. The client loved the 40 extra shots i had and he wants all of them. I had explained that the BUR is based on the production costs and he rightfully says ,,well if i take the 40 extra images it won’t influence the production costs anymore”. The BUR will now be 2 euros/image. How ever you put it my production fees are covered and so are the creative fees but if he wants to reuse 10 images next year I can only base the license fees on the BUR of 2 euros and no the initial 4 euros. Have I shot myself in the foot by saying the production costs don’t actually change if he wants to use the extra images? How can make more money out of this client if he wants more images?

    Comment by Andrew J — April 10, 2012 @ 8:08 am | Reply

    • Hi Andrew
      When you quoted the fee (beforehand), did you say your BUR was 4 Euros per image, based on you agreeing to produce & then provide them with 40 lifestyle images for them to use, for the agreed amount of use ?

      If so, and the client agreed to this beforehand, then the agreement stands at 4 Euro per image.

      The fact that you produced more images or that you went the extra mile on the day – afterwards – doesn’t change this original agreement.

      So if you ended up producing 80 images (afterwards) – and the clients wants to use all 80 images now, then it should be 80 x 4 Euros.

      Just the same as if he wanted to use your images in more media or for a longer period of time or in other territories. Because you are billing him for ‘the use of your images’, not for your time or how much it cost you to produce them… or at least that is what you should be billing him for; otherwise, you are basically agreeing to do work made for hire.

      So basically what has happen here, is you started out talking to him about one thing (the price per image, based on his usage requirements – which was of value to him) and then you confused that with something else (your time & your expenses – which is only of value to you). And he (as a business person) has picked up on this and is now using this to his advantage.

      So the next thing he will be saying is:

      Well if I have paid you for your time & expenses to do this job for me – then what difference should it make now, as to how much I use these images for… right !! Because it’s not like you need to spend any more time shooting stuff or that it will cost you any more… right !!

      This is a very common mistake a lot of photographers make, by the way – which I did too many years ago, because I was to busy thinking about myself – my costs and what the value was to me – rather than staying focused on what was of value to them. So I got confused and basically ended up agreeing to do work made for hire, without even realising that that was infect what I was agreeing too. Which resulted in me therefore wondering why I wasn’t making any more money for doing a ‘really good job’, than I was for just doing ‘an okay job’… until the penny finally dropped one day.

      Thanks to the AOP & their BUR pricing system… which actually took me a while to get my end around, because I was still to busy thinking about myself – my costs and what the value was to me – rather than in terms of what was of value to them.

      Comment by Ashley Morrison — April 10, 2012 @ 9:52 am | Reply

  7. You don’t discuss how you determine the percentage to add or subtract from the BUR based on different usage requirements. Does the book “Beyond the Lens” provide this information and real examples, or is it left to each photographer to determine what percentage to charge? I went to the webpage for the book, but there isn’t much information there either. I’ve read many books on the business of photography and most offer vague information about how to price for usage, so it would be nice if this book actually provides some specific information and real world examples that are applicable to today’s marketplace.

    Comment by Andrew — November 1, 2011 @ 12:51 am | Reply

    • Yes – Chapter 5 in their book contains a number of pages listing the percentage figures for the various Media, as well as, Territories & Period of use. However, they do leave it quite open as they are just suggested percentage figures – so it may say something like: add 30% to 100%.
      Which means, as always, a bit of common sense is required – but I have found it to be very helpful, to have these figures in front of me when talking to a client and/or negotiating the fee – as it’s all very logical, once you know what your BUR is.

      I use a spread sheet, by the way, which has all the percentages and figures already typed in – so I can quickly punch in the numbers relative to the job on hand and have that information in front of me, when talking to the client and negotiating the fee.

      Anyway, in the example I posted, I had worked out my BUR was £210.00 i.e. my basic production costs (the price per image that I would quote, to produce & provide them with 6 images, for them to use in 2 Media, for 1 year, in 1 country.)
      So then using the AOP’s guidelines, I added 100% on for the additional media (£210×100% = £420) and then added another 100% on for 3 years use (£420×100% = £840), to arrive at what the fee would be, for me to produce & provide them with 6 images, to meet their needs i.e. Licence fee based on the above information.

      Comment by Ashley Morrison — November 1, 2011 @ 9:07 am | Reply

      • Thanks for the quick reply Ashley. I found a bit more information on the AOP site after I made my post here, and noticed that the BUR and additional media and license extensions are all discussed in Chapter 5 which deals with Advertising Photography. So would you use the same pricing structure when doing Corporate and Design Photography where you are working directly with the end client? I would imagine much of your Interior Photography would be client direct, and my experience and understanding of this market is that they expect much broader licenses, or a package rights, for much lower fees.

        I just finished reading The Art and Business of Photography by Susan Carr, and I also heard her interviewed recently. She says when she was shooting for architects and interior designers she always provided an unlimited, non-exclusive license. She also says that in today’s market place, with the myriad marketing opportunities available to clients online and in print, clients don’t always know how they’re going to use images. So it’s fair and reasonable to provide them with a comprehensive package of rights, rather than nickel and diming them for every additional usage that might come up in the future.

        I know everyone is free to set their own business practices, and perhaps things are done differently in the UK than they are here in North America, but I’m curious if you apply these same principals to both advertising and client direct work.

        Thanks again.

        Comment by Andrew — November 1, 2011 @ 2:30 pm

      • Lots of questions here Andrew and some good points, so I’ll go through each of them one at a time.

        “So would you use the same pricing structure when doing Corporate and Design Photography where you are working directly with the end client?”

        Yes – because you are simply producing and providing images for ‘others’ to use – so how you go about putting a price on that doesn’t change – just because of ‘their’ usage requirements. Their usage requirements may change the amount you charge and/or what they are prepared to pay you – which in turn may change to the look of the images or what you can afford to do – but you are still just agreeing to produce & then provide them with your images for them to use … unless you have agreed to do ‘work made for hire’ that is !!

        “.. and my experience and understanding of this market is that they expect much broader licenses, or a package rights, for much lower fees.”

        ‘Want’ is not the same as ‘Need’ – which is why you negotiate the fee based on what they ‘need’ to use your images for, rather than what they would like to use your images for, if it made no difference to the price.

        “.. she was shooting for architects and interior designers she always provided an unlimited, non-exclusive license. She also says that in today’s market place, with the myriad marketing opportunities available to clients online and in print, clients don’t always know how they’re going to use images. So it’s fair and reasonable to provide them with a comprehensive package of rights, rather than nickel and diming them for every additional usage that might come up in the future.”

        No problems – so long as the fee and/or the amount they are prepared to pay, is in keeping with what they are asking you to provide them with.
        But if they are saying they need unlimited use, then please read this post on All Rights … and understanding what it is you are asking for – or this one on The way I see it – if someone says the ‘use’ doesn’t really matter.

        Because if you are throwing in ‘unlimited use’ like it really doesn’t matter, then you could be cutting your own throat – should you start providing them with images that they use a lot more than you assumed they would, when you quoted that fee.

        “I’m curious if you apply these same principals to both advertising and client direct work”

        If someone – be it an advertising agency or a direct client – wants me to produce and then provide them with some images, because they want to use them – then ‘yes’ the same principals apply. The fee (Licence fee) is based on their usage requirements. So I need to know what those requirements are first, before I can give them a price for that. Because otherwise, I could be way of the mark in my thinking – especially if I was to always assume, that in ever case, they were needing me to provide them with some images for them to use in a multi million, worldwide advertising campaign, over the next 10 years – when in fact, all they really needed was for me to provide them with some images for them to use in a few small ads in their local magazine.

        So when I’m quoting a fee, I always take my client’s usage requirements into account – and I put that information down in writing, so as we both know what that fee relates too i.e. the Media use, the Period of use & the Territory of use – as well as the number of images and what they are of. That way, we both know what the deal is, before I undertake the assignment, to produce some images to meet their needs.

        Should I then decide to go the extra mile after I have quoted – and produce a set of images which they afterwards wanted to use for other things – over and above what I had quoted for – then I would get rewarded for that – which to me is only fair – and a win, win situation for everyone, should I succeed.

        Now look at what Susan Carr is suggesting – and you will see there is no incentive for her to go the extra mile for her clients – because producing ‘better’ images which her clients will then want to use more and/or for a longer period of time, etc – is actually counter productive. So for her, it’s all about cutting costs and providing them with the minimum – so as they will hopefully come back for more. Because the only way for her to make more money, is for her to shoot more – not to for them to use her images more – because that’s just doing her out of future work.

        May be she hasn’t realise this yet – but one day ‘the penny will drop’ – and when it does, I have no doubt she will regret having said such a thing – because it doesn’t make sense for any business, to give away more than they need to, for the price they are quoting.

        Comment by Ashley Morrison — November 5, 2011 @ 10:47 am

      • “.. rather than nickel and diming them for every additional usage that might come up in the future.”

        So if her clients wanted to take out an ad in a magazine, I wonder would she suggest the publishing company should do the same i.e. just charge a flat fee – for her client to appear in as many of their magazines as they want, as often as they want, over as many pages as they want and for as many years as they want – rather than nickel and diming them for every additional use, over and above what they would normally pay for a one page ad, in one issue, in one of their magazines.

        I very much doubt any publishing company would agree to this Andrew – as we are not talking about nickels & dimes here – especially if they are a national or international publishing company, who produce 20 or 30 different magazines each month. And if they were to quote her clients a fee based on that information i.e. unlimited use – then I’m quite sure her clients would walk away, as the amount would be (or should I say, would need to be) huge.

        By the way, have you ever looked to see at what a one page ad costs in a local magazine verses a national magazine verses an international magazine i.e. 1 media, for 1 month, with the only difference being the Territory of use.
        It’s like add a zero each time – and that’s just one ad in one media for one month.

        Now if someone is asking you to produce & provide them with some images for them to use – don’t you think you should take that information on board – because from your client’s point of view, it may not be nickels & dimes they are talking about – it could be a serious amount of money, which they are planning on spending around the images which they are asking you to provide them with… in the hope to fulfil their needs.

        Start thinking along those lines and you should start to understand why the AOP recommend this pricing system – and why it’s percentage based on the use.
        Because it’s your client’s use that will determine the value to them – which you need to somehow determine, to insure that you have the budget in place, to meet their needs.

        Hence the BUR system.

        Comment by Ashley Morrison — November 5, 2011 @ 3:42 pm

      • As for this statement:

        “She also says that in today’s market place, with the myriad marketing opportunities available to clients online and in print, clients don’t always know how they’re going to use images.”

        As far as I’m concerned, ‘marketing opportunities’ haven’t really changed over the years – other than we now have the Worldwide web.
        What has changed, is what ‘we’ are providing our clients with – which now makes it easier for them to use in various ways to market themselves.

        You see, back in the days of ‘film’, the ‘film’ which we provided our clients with, in many ways limited their use.
        So we usually didn’t have to state what the use was – as that would have already been taken into account beforehand, when we decided what camera system to use (35mm, 6×6, 6×7, 4×5, 10×8, etc), what film type to use (Black & white, transparency film, colour negatives, etc) or what iso to use (100, 200, 400, etc), etc, etc. And as there was often only one original, then that in away also limited how much they could use it, as they had to wait for it to be returned before they could send it of to the next person/magazine/newspaper/or whoever. Plus at some point the ‘film’ would probably get lost or damaged – so that would be the end of it.
        All of this meant they needed new images on a regular bases – and those images where usually shot with X amount of use in mind – which we would have known about, but possibly never actually stopped to mention, as it was usually very obvious.

        Today however, all that has changed, as we now provide our clients with something very different.
        A digital file – which can be used over and over again, in many different media at the same time. Perfect copies can be made and it can be email to hundreds of people around the world at the click of a button. The file won’t wear out and therefore can be used for years to come. And if it’s a really good file i.e. produced using a digital back for example – then the use is almost unlimited, as it will look great at any size and/or in any media.

        Brilliant.

        But if you don’t somehow control the use – and charge accordingly – then it may not be so brilliant of us.
        Because your current clients could start becoming old clients real fast – who are just continuing to use your images for years to come – if what you provide them with is ‘really good’. Which is what happen to me about 6 or 7 years ago, when I started to go the extra mile for them – which resulted in me losing a lot of regular clients, because they are still using those same images to this very day.

        So basically you have two options, if you want to keep them as a regular client (i.e. someone who pays you money on a regular bases, for what you are providing them with):

        1. Control the use by providing them with images that they will not want to use that much, so as they keep asking you back to shoot more.
        2. Control the use by charging for what all they want to use your images for – and then try to provide them with images which they will want to use a lot more, so as you don’t have to keep shooting more.

        No.2 means you may be able to retire someday.
        No.1 means you need to keep at it.

        Your call – but I know which one I prefer – as I’m not getting any younger :)

        Comment by Ashley Morrison — November 5, 2011 @ 9:21 pm

  8. Reading from Indianapolis, In USA. Article was simple and to the point. Thank you.

    Comment by Stephen A Duncan — October 24, 2011 @ 1:03 pm | Reply

  9. Quite good article. I basically stumbled upon your webpage and desired to mention that I have definitely liked studying your blog and blogposts. Anyway I’ll be following your feed and I hope to read your blog again.

    Comment by Kathryn Shurman — September 16, 2011 @ 6:49 am | Reply

  10. Nowadays you can observe a whole lot info in addition to ideas it’s the same simply wonderful to read something fresh to get a transform. My partner and i enjoy your entire endeavours in writing and posting that will in addition to Let me convey a hyperlink to your home from my own weblog

    Comment by cheap designer shoes — September 13, 2011 @ 10:19 pm | Reply

  11. After study a couple of of the blog posts on your web site now, and I actually like your approach of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark website checklist and shall be checking again soon. Pls check out my web page as well and let me know what you think.

    Comment by Tuan Mcclurkin — September 13, 2011 @ 10:16 am | Reply

  12. Thanks for the suggestions you have shared in Base Usage Rate. Ashley Morrison's Blog. Something else I would like to convey is that computer system memory demands generally go up along with other improvements in the engineering. For instance, as soon as new generations of processors are brought to the market, there is certainly usually a related increase in the shape calls for of all laptop memory as well as hard drive space. This is because the software operated by way of these cpus will inevitably rise in power to make use of the new technological know-how.

    Comment by jocuri — September 12, 2011 @ 9:57 pm | Reply

  13. Well put from an incredible blogger

    Comment by hotshot bald cop — September 3, 2011 @ 3:04 pm | Reply

  14. You should participate in a contest for among the finest blogs on the web. I’ll suggest this site!

    Comment by Melida Seabrooke — August 29, 2011 @ 3:27 pm | Reply

  15. this kind of magnificent and intensely educational publish makes myself want to start off my morning off on the great note, with thanks to my kindle

    Comment by kindle store — August 27, 2011 @ 3:59 pm | Reply

  16. The most excellent things to choose on line is to examine answers, that’s the reasons why I have to continue to keep returning back at this site, you guys do a wonderful duty

    Comment by kindle 3 — August 27, 2011 @ 3:53 pm | Reply

  17. ashleymorrisonphotography.wordpress.com is amazing, bookmarked!

    [url=http://www.facebook.com/pages/MMA-betting/221344401210163]mma betting[/url]

    Comment by mmabetting — June 11, 2011 @ 10:22 pm | Reply

  18. Great tips!

    Comment by Kelly — March 16, 2011 @ 3:29 pm | Reply

  19. I found about your blog on yahoo and checked a few of your early posts. I hope you will keep up the very good work. I just added your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. I’m seeing forward to reading more from you later on!

    Comment by Corey Aul — February 26, 2011 @ 3:02 am | Reply

  20. We appreciate you discussing your own encounter concerning this matter.

    Comment by indanapolis marketing — February 4, 2011 @ 9:09 am | Reply

  21. Thank you for giving out these kind of extremely tips. Congratulations on becoming an amazing blogger.

    Comment by Click Here — January 23, 2011 @ 4:51 am | Reply

  22. Hi Ashley, Thanks for sharing this information and your openness. I admire your work for several years now and have discovered your weblog. You’re a big inspiration for me.

    Ruud
    Netherlands

    Comment by Ruud Legdeur — January 11, 2011 @ 7:14 pm | Reply

  23. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by triciamergeleft, ampimage. ampimage said: Base Usage Rate. http://wp.me/pRUiV-8H [...]

    Pingback by Tweets that mention Base Usage Rate. -- Topsy.com — July 29, 2010 @ 10:18 pm | Reply

  24. [...] can read it on his blog here. TAGS:Ashley Morrison, Photo usage [...]

    Pingback by Photography usage rights | Updates On MergeLeft Artists — July 29, 2010 @ 8:16 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 303 other followers